2015 new Honda CBR500R vs Kawasaki Ninja 300

2015 new Honda CBR500R vs Kawasaki Ninja 300




They’re both competent, sporty all-rounders, good for getting to work or getting a moderate shift on. They're both built to high-quality, Japanese standards. They're both great looking. Only £200 separates them in price. So which should you buy? Our Versus guides are here to give you a quick helping-hand through the trickiest buying choices, starting with: CBR500R vs Ninja 300


Reasons to buy CBR500R









  • At 47bhp, it’s bang on the power limit for A2 licence holders
  • At £5,099 on the road, it’s one of the cheapest middle-weight bikes you can buy
  • Being a Honda, you can hope for a high level of reliability, build-quality and after-sales service
  • It’s comfortable, with fairing and a fairly upright riding position

  • It’s well-proportioned and pretty
  • It handles well and can be pushed hard, with decent brakes and suspension. ABS is standard.
  • There’s a pleasing, torquey response from the parallel twin engine
  • It’s the official bike of the European Junior Cup championship for 14-to-19-year-olds

Price: £5,099 OTR
Capacity: 471cc
Power: 47bhp

Weight: 194kg
Seat height: 790mm

Reason to buy Ninja 300

  • At £4,891 on the road, it’s only £542 more than a Yamaha YZF-R125

  • It looks great. With no ‘300’ stickers, it could be mistaken for a ZX-6R

  • The riding position is sporty but comfortable

  • The parallel twin engine loves to rev. There’s useable torque from 3,000rpm and it really comes alive from 8,000rpm.

  • It’s a capable handler, making for composed and precise cornering

Price: £4891 OTR (£5,291 with ABS) 
Capacity: 296cc
Power: 38bhp
Weight: 172kg kerb (£174kg ABS)
Seat height: 786mm

Our choice: Honda CBR500R


The Ninja is great fun but essentially the hangover of a disappearing market. Its predecessor, the Ninja 250R, catered perfectly for newly-qualified riders restricted to 33bhp. In January this year that restriction rose to 47bhp. The heavily-revised Ninja 300 is Kawasaki’s response, offering 38bhp. But if you can have 47bhp, surely that’s how many you want. In which case a £200 saving seems the remaining argument for the Kawasaki. That's without factoring in ABS, which is standard on the Honda. Much as we like the Ninja, it loses this battle.

honda vs kawasaki

0 comments:

Post a Comment